Plus what difference would turns and wiggles make if you can’t actually get off there? Straight lines are the easiest to process. Could perhaps be simplified a little further in parts.When you ride transit you typically know where you want to go and are looking at maps to see how to get there, not how many turns there are along the way. Our rating: A great effort from Alec here – a very clean modernist look that works really well for the most part. Atlanta natives might know what “The Perimeter” is, but tourists and visitors almost certainly don’t! The tiny, spindly white label on a light grey background is also quite difficult to read. Likewise, I think Alec needs to append “I-285” to the label for the framing ring road. I’m not entirely sold by Alec’s naming of the lines, which seems potentially confusing to me: an announcement like “This is a Doraville Line train to the Airport” seems almost certain to cause panic among those unfamiliar with the system. A little further exploration of symbols to come up with something more immediately and obviously different could be good. With only four clearly-labelled lines, this isn’t a huge issue for Atlanta, but it’s nice to see that it’s been a design consideration for Alec.Īlec’s solution to the different service patterns is in line with the minimalist principles of the map (white dot = full time service, white hollow dot = daytime service, white hollow diamond = daytime service on weekdays only), although the diamond is perhaps visually a little too similar to the hollow circle on first glance. Finally - as Alec says - the colours do work better for colour-blind users, as seen below in comparison to the official map (left). The yellow then belongs to the line that gets cut back to serve as a shuttle in the evenings, similar to the treatment of the lighter blue line along the east-west trunk. If anything, it might be good to swap the orange and yellow line colours, just to give the stronger colour to the line that has service along its full length at all times. The two warm colours share a trunk line, as do the two colder colours. I like Alec’s reworking of the line colours, both because it brings them in line with MARTA’s branding (as he notes), but it also makes the service relationships between the pairs of lines more obvious. With a simplified diagram like this that obviously draws influence from his work, it’s good to ask, “What would Massimo Vignelli have done here?” - the answer would almost always be to simplify down to the absolute barest of elements. Without having to show the relationship of those stations to Atlanta’s highway network like the official map does, I feel that this whole section could just be straightened out. There are a few elements that are at odds with that simplicity, like the attempt to show the actual routing of the Atlanta Streetcar and the overly fussy right-angled bends that the northern end of the Orange Line takes past Medical Center. There’s a lot to like in Alec’s reworking of Atlanta’s rapid rail transit network - a minimalist look with really nice typography, definitely evoking a very mid-century design feel. I’ve named the lines after their unique terminals, which erases the potential confusion for tourists or first-time riders of which branch goes where. For this map, I’ve “rebranded” the line colors, which has the added benefit of making them easier to distinguish for those with colorblindness. I’ve always been puzzled as to why the colors in MARTA’s logo don’t reflect those of the lines. Long-time reader here with my first submission, a redesign of Atlanta’s MARTA rail system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |